| UAA Home > News > Scientists review how global warming affects Arctic climate change
Scientists review how global warming affects Arctic climate change
By: Staff Sep 14, 2009
An international team of experts issues a call to action
ANCHORAGE, AK – “We need to better understand how winter comes and goes and how that drives shifts in plant-animal interactions,” said Jeff Welker, professor of biology at the University of Alaska Anchorage and co-author of a paper to be published Sept. 11, 2009 in the journal “Science.” (.)
Understanding how changes in plant and animal populations affect each other and how they affect the physical or nonliving components of the Arctic is critical to comprehending how climate warming will change the Arctic. “This paper identifies gaps in our knowledge, what we need to be doing and where the public needs to spend its money,” said Welker. Hear Welker discuss the paper in a 13-minute podcast.
Much of circumpolar Arctic research focuses on the physical, direct changes resulting from climate warming such as sea ice retreat and temperature increases. The paper reviews current knowledge about ecological consequences of climate change on the circumpolar Arctic and issues a call for action in several areas of global climate change research.
The international team of scientists who collaborated on this paper reviewed dozens of research documents on the effects of circumpolar Arctic warming and note numerous direct effects including: lengthening of the growing season following a rapid spring melt, earlier plant flowering and appearance of insects following a warmer spring, deaths of newborn seal pups following melting of their under-snow birthing chambers have other, often more subtle, indirect effects on plants, animals and humans that warrants increased attention.
One effect studied intensively at the University of Alaska Fairbanks Institute of Arctic Biology Toolik Field Station on Alaska’s North Slope is what occurs under the snow. In 2008, the snow started falling in September and never quit. The warmer winter soils with their active microbes were insulated from the cold and were able to provide nutrients to plants that stimulated growth.
In contrast, when it didn’t snow at Toolik Field Station until Thanksgiving a few years ago, the soil got cold and stayed cold. So cold that microbes in the soil were barely active. The spring green-up was slow in coming and likely affected caribou forage, says Welker.
Another effect studied intensively in Alaska is shrub expansion on the tundra.
“Shrubs are increasing on the tundra as the climate warms and more shrubs will lead to more warming in the spring,” said Syndonia “Donie” Bret-Harte, associate professor of biology at the University of Alaska Fairbanks. Snow reflects most incoming radiation, which is simply light that can transfer heat. Shrubs that stick out of the snow in spring absorb radiation and give off heat. In this positive feedback cycle, the heating of the air immediately above the snow warms the snow, causing it to melt sooner. Warmer soils lead to increased nutrient availability, which contributes to greater shrub growth, which then contributes to still more warming.
“What’s understudied is the living component of the Arctic and that includes humans,” said Bret-Harte, who specializes in Arctic plant ecology in Alaska. “Humans live in the Arctic with plants and animals and we care about the ecosystem services such as filtering water, fiber and food production and cultural values that the Arctic provides,” said Bret-Harte. The global average surface temperature has increased by 0.72 F (0.4 C) over the past 150 years and the average Arctic temperature is expected to increase by 6 C. “That’s a mind bogglingly large change to contemplate and keep in mind that no one lives at the average temperature,” Bret-Harte said.
The authors call for immediate attention to the conservation of Arctic ecosystems, understanding the ecology of Arctic winters, understanding extreme events such as wildfires and extended droughts, and the need for more baseline studies to improve predictions.
The research team was led by Eric Post, Penn State University, and included biologists, ecologists, geographers, botanists, anthropologists, and fish and wildlife experts from the University of Alberta and the Canadian Wildlife Service in Canada; Aarhus University and the University of Copenhagen in Denmark; the University of Helsinki in Finland; the Arctic Ecology Research Group in France; the Greenland Institute of Natural Resources in Greenland; the University Centre on Svalbard, the University of Tromsø, and the Centre for Saami Studies in Norway; the University of Aberdeen and the University of Stirling in Scotland; Lund University and the Abisko Scientific Research Station in Sweden; the University of Sheffield in the UK; and the Institute of Arctic Biology and the U.S. Geological Survey at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, the Environment and Natural Resources Institute (ENRI) of the University of Alaska Anchorage, and the University of Washington in the United States.
Support was provided by Aarhus University, The Danish Polar Center and the U.S. National Science Foundation. For more information: Jeffrey Welker, ENRI Director, at email@example.com or (907)257-2701